Court Rules Hillary Must - Under Oath - Answer 25 Questions Within Thirty Days - Deadline Thursday, Sept 29, 2016

Especially condemning #14: 
​"On March 6, 2009, Asst Secy of State for Diplomatic Security Eric J. Boswell wrote in an Information Memo [IM] to your Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, that he “cannot stress too strongly, however, that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving email, and exploiting calendars.”A March 11, 2009 email states that, in a management meeting with the assistant secretaries, you approached Asst Secy Boswell and mentioned that you had read the “IM” and that you “get it.” ... why did you continue using an unclassified BlackBerry to access your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Dept business? 

---

8-30-16, ZeroHedge -- On it's website, Judicial Watch announced that it has submitted a list of 25 questions to Hillary Clinton regarding her email practices while serving as Sec of State. U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has ordered Mrs Clinton to respond - under oath - within thirty days. Judicial Watch was limited to a total of 25 questions; they follow:

1.     Describe the creation of the clintonemail.com system, including who decided to create the system, the date it was decided to create the system, why it was created, who set it up, and when it became operational.
2.     Describe the creation of your clintonemail.com email account, including who decided to create it, when it was created, why it was created, and, if you did not set up the account yourself, who set it up for you.
3.     When did you decide to use a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business and whom did you consult in making this decision?
4.     Identify all communications in which you participated concerning or relating to your decision to use a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Dept business and, for each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.
5.     In a 60 Minutes interview aired on July 24, 2016, you stated that it was “recommended” you use a personal email account to conduct official State Dept business. What recommendations were you given about using or not using a personal email account to conduct official State Dept business, who made any such recommendations, and when ...?
6.     Were you ever advised, cautioned, or warned, was it ever suggested, or did you ever participate in any communication, conversation, or meeting in which it was discussed that your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Dept business conflicted with or violated federal recordkeeping laws...
7.     Your campaign website states, “When Clinton got to the Dept, she opted to use her personal email account as a matter of convenience.” What factors other than convenience did you consider in deciding to use a personal email account to conduct official State Dept business? ...
8.     After President Obama nominated you to be Secretary of State and during your tenure as secretary, did you expect the State Dept to receive FOIA requests for or concerning your email?
9.     During your tenure as Sec of State, did you understand that email you sent or received in the course of conducting official State Dept business was subject to FOIA?
10.     During your tenure as Secretary of State, how did you manage and preserve emails in your clintonemail.com email account sent or received in the course of conducting official State Dept business, and what, if anything, did you do to make those emails available to the Department for conducting searches in response to FOIA requests?
11.     During your tenure as Sec of State, what, if any, effort did you make to inform the State Dept’s records management personnel (e.g., Clarence Finney or the Executive Secretariat’s Ofc of Records) about your use of a clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Dept business?
12.     During your tenure as Sec of State, did State Dept personnel ever request access to your clintonemail.com email account to search for email responsive to a FOIA request? ...
13.    ... did you consider how emails you sent to or received from persons who did not have State Dept email accounts (i.e., “state.gov” accounts) would be maintained and preserved by the Dept or searched by the Dept in response to FOIA requests? If so, what was your understanding about how such emails would be maintained, preserved, or searched by the Dept in response to FOIA requests?
14.     On March 6, 2009, Assistant Secretary of State for Diplomatic Security Eric J. Boswell wrote in an Information Memo to your Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills, that he “cannot stress too strongly, however, that any unclassified BlackBerry is highly vulnerable in any setting to remotely and covertly monitoring conversations, retrieving email, and exploiting calendars.” A March 11, 2009 email states that, in a management meeting with the assistant secretaries, you approached Assistant Secretary Boswell and mentioned that you had read the “IM” and that you “get it.” Did you review the March 6, 2009 Information Memo, and, if so, why did you continue using an unclassified BlackBerry to access your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business? Copies of the March 6, 2009 Information Memo and March 11, 2009 email are attached as Exhibit A for your review.
15.     In a Nov 13, 2010 email exchange with Huma Abedin about problems with your clintonemail.com email account, you wrote to Ms. Abedin, in response to her suggestion that you use a State Dept email account or release your email address to the Dept, “Let’s get a separate address or device.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Dept business ...
16.     Email exchanges among your top aides and assistants in Aug 30, 2011 discuss providing you with a State Dept-issued BlackBerry or State Dept email address. In the course of these discussions, State Dept Exec Sec Stephen Mull wrote, “[W]e are working to provide the Secretary per her request a Dept issued BlackBerry to replace her personal unit which is malfunctioning (possibly because of her personal email server is down). We will prepare two versions for her to use – one with an operating State Dept email account (which would mask her identity, but which would also be subject to FOIA requests)....
17.     In Feb 2011, Asst Sec Boswell sent you an Information Memo noting “a dramatic increase since January 2011 in attempts . . . to compromise the private home email accounts of senior Dept officials.” Asst Sec Boswell “urge[d] Dept users to minimize the use of personal web-email for business.” Did you review Boswell’s Information Memo in or after February 2011, and, if so, why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Dept business?....
18.     On June 28, 2011, you sent a message to all State Department personnel about securing personal email accounts. In the message, you noted “recent targeting of personal email accounts by online adversaries” and directed all personnel to “[a]void conducting official Department business from your personal email accounts.” Why did you continue using your clintonemail.com email account to conduct official State Department business ...
19.     Were you ever advised, cautioned, or warned about hacking or attempted hacking of your clintonemail.com email account or the server that hosted your clintonemail.com account and, if so, what did you do in response to the advice, caution, or warning?
20.     When you were preparing to leave office, did you consider allowing the State Department access to your clintonemail.com email account to manage and preserve the official emails in your account and to search those emails in response to FOIA requests? If you considered allowing access to your email account, why did you decide against it? If you did not consider allowing access to your email account, why not?
21.     After you left office, did you believe you could alter, destroy, disclose, or use email you sent or received concerning official State Department business as you saw fit? If not, why not?
22.     In late 2014, the State Department asked that you make available to the Department copies of any federal records of which you were aware, “such as an email sent or received on a personal email account while serving as Secretary of State.” After you left office but before your attorneys reviewed the email in your clintonemail.com email account in response to the State Department’s request, did you alter, destroy,...
23.      During your October 22, 2015 appearance before the U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee on Benghazi, you testified that 90 to 95 percent of your emails “were in the State’s system” and “if they wanted to see them, they would certainly have been able to do so.” Identify the basis for this statement, including all facts on which you relied in support of the statement, how and when you became aware of these facts, and, if you were made aware of these facts by or through another person, identify the person who made you aware of these facts.
24.     Identify all communications between you and Brian Pagliano concerning or relating to the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of any emails in your clintonemail.com email account, including any instruction or direction to Mr. Pagliano about the management, preservation, deletion, or destruction of emails in your account when transferring the clintonemail.com email system to any alternate or replacement server. For each communication, identify the time, date, place, manner (e.g., in person, in writing, by telephone, or by electronic or other means), persons present or participating, and content of the communication.
25. ​Full list here: 

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-30/hillary-has-until-september-29-respond-under-oath-these-25-questions-judicial-watch